Journal of Orofacial Rehabilitation
Year 2024
Vol 4 Issue 3
1. Editorial l J Orofacial Rehabilitation. 2024 Dec;4(3):1-2.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14546734
AI apps and software for writing research papers.
Arka Swarnakar.
2. Original Research l J Orofacial Rehabilitation. 2024 Dec;4(3):3-15.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14545608
A comparison of the retentive ability of various denture adhesives on different denture base materials: an in vitro study.
Chiranjeev Gogoi, Manesh Lahori, Rahul Nagrath, Siddharth Sisodiya, Prerna Kaushik, Shikha Shahi.
Abstract
Statement of Problem: Given the variety of denture adhesives and base resins available, it is critical that dentists suggest the right ones to their patients.
Purpose: In addition to subjectively assessing and contrasting the retentive qualities of various denture adhesives, this study aims to explore the subtleties of how they interact with various denture base materials.
Material and Methods: Three denture base materials—DPI, Lucitone, and Trevalon—were used to evaluate Polident, Fixon, Fixon Super Grip, and Secure. The control was artificial saliva. By assessing the adhesion and cohesion that formed between a glass surface and an acrylic resin disc surface after adhesives were applied between them, the retentive capacity of the denture adhesives was evaluated. Tukey’s post hoc test and one-way ANOVA were used to assess the significance of the mean results.
Results: The highest retention recorded for denture base resins in their decreasing order: DPI with Polident + Saliva (Mean=854.390 gms), Trevalon with Polident + Saliva (Mean=821.890 gms) & Lucitone with Secure + Saliva (Mean=711.890).
Conclusions: Polident with Saliva and DPI denture base resin showed the highest retention. The mean retention of denture adhesives was higher when they were tested along with artificial saliva rather than alone. The adhesives with cream consistency showed higher mean retention than the powder consistency.
Keywords– Denture adhesives, Denture Base, Fixon, Polident, Retention.
3. Original Research l J Orofacial Rehabilitation. 2024 Dec;4(3):16-24.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14545714
Comparison of gingival displacement using paste technique and combination technique (cord and paste) in digital impressions: A pilot study.
Amisha Kumar, V.Vidyashree Nandini, Shiney Boruah, L. Jailance.
Abstract
Statement of the problem: Digital impressions require a good amount of gingival displacement to capture finish line precisely. A clinical comparison between the paste and a combination of paste and cord technique of gingival displacement for digital impression is required.
Purpose of the study: The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate which gingival displacement system would show better gingival retraction in digital intraoral scanners (digital impression).
Materials and methods: A series of four cases and eight teeth were conventionally prepared according to the guideline dimensions for porcelain fused to metal crowns, and allocated at random to two groups: gingival retraction paste system and retraction cord with paste (combination system). Segmental digital impressions were taken before and after gingival displacement. The stereolithography (STL) files were assessed in vertical dimension in the buccal and lingual aspects on a CAD superimposition software, 3D Tool. The differences in the amount of gingival displacement were measured and statistically analysed.
Results: PB (paste only for buccal aspect) and CB (cord and paste for buccal aspect), demonstrated no significant difference in gingival displacement (P= 0.442), whereas PL (paste only for lingual aspect), and CL (cord and paste for the lingual aspect) showed a significant gingival displacement (P= 0.042 or P<0.05), with paste showing better gingival displacement.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, vertical gingival displacement achieved using the paste and the combination technique was equal. Additional use of a cord for gingival displacement did not provide better retraction when the intraoral scanner impression was made.
Keywords: Combination System, Digital Impression, Gingival Displacement, Intraoral Scanner, Retraction Paste, Vertical Displacement.
4. Review Article l J Orofacial Rehabilitation. 2024 Dec;4(3):25-34.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14545778
Redefining orofacial rehabilitation for transformative clinical outcomes.
N Gopi Chander.
Abstract
Orofacial rehabilitation is a cornerstone in restoring function, aesthetics, and quality of life for individuals affected by congenital anomalies, trauma, or disease. While conventional approaches have achieved significant milestones, the evolving demands of personalized care and advancements in technology necessitate redefining the boundaries of this field. This review explores the transformative potential of innovative techniques and materials in orofacial rehabilitation, with a focus on bridging existing gaps and envisioning future possibilities.
The integration of cutting-edge technologies such as 3D printing, CAD/CAM systems, and artificial intelligence has revolutionized precision and customization in prosthetic fabrication. Concurrently, advancements in biomimetic materials, biopolymers, and nanotechnology offer new avenues for enhancing durability, functionality, and patient comfort. The emergence of regenerative medicine, including tissue engineering and stem cell therapies, further highlights the potential for restoring biological structures rather than merely replacing them.
The clinical implications of these innovations, emphasize their role in improving patient outcomes, addressing current challenges, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. It also examines the ethical and sustainability aspects of incorporating novel solutions into clinical practice. Finally, it identifies promising research directions, including the role of artificial intelligence, genetic influences, and eco-friendly practices in shaping the future of orofacial rehabilitation.
By reimagining traditional practices and embracing innovation this approach aims to inspire clinicians, researchers, and educators to push the boundaries of orofacial rehabilitation.
Keywords: 3D printing, Artificial Intelligence, CAD/CAM, Orofacial rehabilitation.
5. Review Article l J Orofacial Rehabilitation. 2024 Dec;4(3):35-39.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14546587
Radioactivity of Materials used in Prosthodontics: An Overview.
Thiruthik R, Surya R, V. Vidyashree Nandini.
Abstract
Objective: Dental materials used in prosthodontics and restorative dentistry include materials with radioactive properties. The sources of radioactivity in dental materials are covered in this overview, along with their geological origins and production methods.
Background: Dental office personnel require extensive knowledge on radioactivity and radiation from the materials used in dentistry. Available literature is sparse with limited studies on their adverse effects.
Methodology: Articles published were collected and reviewed to gain an insight on this topic and the search has been done electronically between 2006 and 2023.
Results: Zirconia, glass based ceramics, feldspathic ceramics and resin based materials have a potential for radioactivity
Conclusion: Emphasis must be placed on measures of radioactivity in dental materials, quality control and regulatory standards for dental personnel. There is a need for more studies to determine the true effects on dental professionals and patients.
Application: Possible health hazards of prolonged radiation exposure must be borne in mind while choosing restorative options.
Keywords: Radioactivity, radiobiology, radioactive hazard release.
6. Case Report l J Orofacial Rehabilitation. 2024 Dec;4(3):40-43.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14546623
Strategic management of chronic pulpitis with post and core restoration: A clinical approach to anterior tooth rehabilitation.
Monika Kumari, Rishita Richi, Sumit Kumar Roy, Neeta Sinha.
Abstract
Chronic pulpitis is a prevalent condition that often results in significant tooth structure loss, necessitating restorative treatments. For teeth with extensive damage, post and core restorations are essential to restore both functionality and aesthetics. These procedures are particularly important in providing structural support for crowns (Sorensen & Martinoff, 1984). The use of fiber-reinforced posts has gained popularity due to their excellent biocompatibility, high adhesive strength, and superior stress distribution, making them ideal for endodontically treated teeth (Schmidlin et al., 2008). This case report details the stepwise management of chronic pulpitis through post and core restoration.
Keywords: Chronic pulpitis, post and core, fiber post, composite core buildup, full veneer crown.
7. Case Report l J Orofacial Rehabilitation. 2024 Dec;4(3):44-48.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14546694
Immediate and definitive hollow bulb obturator for partial maxillectomy – A case report.
Akshita Arora, Senjuti Dutta.
Abstract
For patients with partial or total maxillectomy defects, prosthetic rehabilitation with an obturator prosthesis is the gold standard treatment, offering optimal functional and cosmetic outcomes. The hollow obturator prosthesis reduces the load on the underlying and surrounding tissues. It is fabricated using a simple, cost-effective technique. A wax pattern is generated to replicate the defect area, which is then filled with water, frozen and used as a template. The resulting ice block is sandwiched between two layers of heat-cured acrylic resin, ultimately forming the prosthetic device. After curing, a hole is made to remove the ice block, leaving a hollow space, which is then filled with cold-cure acrylic resin, and a lightweight, uniformly thick prosthesis is created.
Keywords: Hollow bulb obturator, partial maxillectomy, prosthetic rehabilitation.